True, But Maybe Missed Real Paradigm Shift

Doc Huston
1 min readSep 8, 2016

As you outline the situation it makes sense. But, as I read it, what you presented is a logical, linear extension of existing industrial model —

my best guess. The physical electrical grid as we understand it will still exist, and will continue to be operated by the public utilities we’re familiar with. Most of our energy will still come from large, centralized sources — much of that from utility-scale natural gas, and eventually wind and solar.

In other words, nothing has change beyond substituting renewables for fossil fuels — better, but still centralized model/paradigm with greater reliance of batteries.

My best guess is synthetic biology designs an organism that generates a type fuel, sans pollution, that provides decentralized energy for all systems (e.g., Craig Venter’s project). This is would be more in sync with your PC-Internet analogy.

With this paradigm you get best of both world. We could have utility scale fuel producing organisms (Venter has already outlined size and cost parameters) used to generate electricity but ALSO have home and auto units that are economical (instead of existing generators, think terrariums).

Doc Huston

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Doc Huston
Doc Huston

Written by Doc Huston

Consultant & Speaker on future nexus of technology-economics-politics, PhD Nested System Evolution, MA Alternative Futures, Patent Holder — dochuston1@gmail.com

No responses yet

Write a response