Justified Anger, But Misdirected Outrage

Doc Huston
1 min readOct 1, 2016

Objecting to one stereotype to vilify another is the current political game of identity politics. It is old-fashion tribalism. Even if Bernie had succeeded, there is zero reason to assume he would perform any better than Obama as you note. The problem is the medieval “system” itself. Changing names, faces, race, gender, promises or slogans takes us nowhere beyond buyers remorse, then frustration and, as with you, now, anger.

As I have said elsewhere,

Given how disturbingly dysfunctional our existing 18th century electoral and political systems are now, why does anyone assume they will somehow become better? Will they work better 20 years from now in 2036? How about in 2050 or 2070? If they are not going to work better, when do we start to design a new political system? Now or when things become still more dysfunctional and dangerous to our well-being?

Doc Huston

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

Doc Huston
Doc Huston

Written by Doc Huston

Consultant & Speaker on future nexus of technology-economics-politics, PhD Nested System Evolution, MA Alternative Futures, Patent Holder — dochuston1@gmail.com

Responses (2)

Write a response

when things become still more dysfunctional and dangerous

Disregarding technological inertia that eventually guarantees “bottom-up” paradigm shifts, danger is the only catalyst that will force any semblance of top-down change.
There exists an amalgam of forces currently increasing geopolitical transparency…

--